<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Why AI Code Review Goes First (And Humans Go Second) (feat: CodeRabbit)</title><link>https://devopstoolkit.live/ai/why-ai-code-review-goes-first-and-humans-go-second-feat-coderabbit/index.html</link><description>Code review was the safety net. The last check before something shipped. The place where bad ideas got caught, sloppy work got pushed back, and someone with fresh eyes made sure the change actually made sense.
On most teams, that net is breaking. Not because reviewers got worse. Not because standards dropped. Something fundamental about how code gets written changed, and the review process never caught up.
You can feel it if you’ve been paying attention. Pull requests sitting open for days. Approvals coming back so fast nobody could have read the diff. Small mistakes slipping through that would’ve been caught two years ago. The cracks are showing.
In this video, I’ll show you what’s actually breaking and why, the workflow that closes the gap, and the specific tool I use on every pull request to make it real.</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate/><atom:link href="https://devopstoolkit.live/ai/why-ai-code-review-goes-first-and-humans-go-second-feat-coderabbit/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/></channel></rss>